Skip to main content

Focus area 04

Evidence & Research Methods

Evidence and research methods work explains how knowledge for public decisions is produced and graded — including randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, systematic reviews, and the frameworks used to judge how strong a body of evidence is.

Public arguments increasingly cite “the evidence” without saying what kind of evidence it is or how much weight it can bear. The difference between a randomised trial, an observational correlation, and an expert opinion is not pedantry — it determines what a study can and cannot show.

This programme provides plain-language primers on core research designs and the vocabulary of evidence appraisal, so that readers can evaluate claims rather than defer to them.

Questions this programme addresses

  1. What makes a study design more or less able to support causal claims?
  2. How do systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate evidence, and where do they fail?
  3. How should uncertainty — confidence intervals, margins of error — be communicated and read?

Publications in this area

Explainer

What Is Evidence-Based Policymaking?

Where the idea came from, what counts as evidence, the institutions built around it, and the honest limits of letting evidence guide public decisions.

Insights in this area